千變萬化的飛俠

2026年10月27日星期二

2026年10月26日星期一

No Striker Up Front, No Goalkeeper in Goal: Alonso’s Revolutionary Invisible Football

Chelsea suffered a humiliating home defeat to a low-form Tottenham Hotspur. Before the match, João Pardo was injured, and Alonso deployed a strange "False Nine" formation, with Rogers upfront as the striker. Quenda, who had never played on the right wing before, started on the left, while Hato played on the right. Heavy rain left the pitch slippery, making it impossible to execute fluid ground attacks. Furthermore, the frontline's attack heavily relied on the individual brilliance of the forward players. Currently, the Blues have no tactical cohesion or set pieces prepared before matches, except for yielding possession to play on the counter-attack; everything relies entirely on the players' sudden flashes of inspiration. Under normal circumstances, when individual abilities can be fully utilized, this poses no problem. However, when faced with unexpected emergencies, given Alonso's capabilities, defeat becomes inevitable.

Quenda showed more courage than tactical awareness, repeatedly rushing out to press and frequently losing possession. Hato is strong in attack but weak in defense, so his inclusion to assist in defense was bound to leave gaping holes everywhere. By not starting Vebjerk as the natural center-forward, Rogers was forced into an uncomfortable position leading the line. Pardo was forced to juggle both attacking and defensive duties on the left wing, while Acheampong was left overwhelmed by Tottenham's relentless overlapping runs. Throughout the match, Tottenham heavily targeted the Blues' vulnerable right defensive flank, which ultimately led to goalkeeper Mendes mishandling a corner from the right and punching the ball into his own net. Unable to mount successful counter-attacks, Cole Palmer got into a confrontation with an opponent and was sent off with a straight red card, after which the Blues conceded a second goal to seal a complete defeat. Overall, Tottenham possessed a clear attacking vision, and their players were highly motivated in executing the manager's intentions flawlessly. On the other hand, Chelsea's tactics and formation were chaotic to the extreme; they were pushed into a highly passive state and failed to register any effective shots on goal.

Alonso stubbornly insists on a so-called 3-4-3 system but fits it with the wrong personnel, and he is incapable of adapting his approach against different opponents. Chelsea's current roster is far better suited for a traditional 4-2-3-1. Conte once won the Premier League title using a similar 3-4-3 formation, but he had Marcos Alonso and Victor Moses at his disposal back then, and the Blues have historically been renowned for their goalscoring defenders and a formidable, elite-level defensive capability in Europe. In contrast, Alonso operates much like Manchester United's Amorim, rigidly clinging to a single formation with a glaring lack of variation, failing to make adjustments based on the actual situation, and making delayed, aimless substitutions. Since the start of the season, the entire team has relied completely on individual talent, with absolutely no tactical identity to speak of across the squad. His success in the Bundesliga only required maintaining stability and overcoming Bayern Munich to secure the title; moreover, the Bundesliga operates in a way where the entire league essentially sustains one team. To provide a shred of suspense, Bayern will occasionally yield the title every few years, which also serves the needs of betting odds. Even Vincent Kompany, who couldn't cut it in the Premier League, could make a name for himself and become an elite manager at Bayern. Alonso's success in the Bundesliga does not prove his ability; rather, his failure at Real Madrid was a true reflection of his incompetence.

Under his stewardship, the attack relies entirely on capitalizing on random, makeshift opportunities rather than any premeditated tactical setups. He appears completely helpless when handling on-pitch emergencies, and his substitutions lack any tactical intent. A great player does not necessarily make a great manager. Without over a decade of grinding in top-tier leagues and proving oneself through exceptional achievements, relying solely on personal fame to lead a team may yield occasional success, but it will ultimately meet an inevitable failure. Mendes' technical flaws were already evident when he came on as a substitute last match—despite his height, he is hesitant to claim aerial balls, likes to rush out recklessly, and pays no attention to his positioning. A goalkeeper who has not been tested in major high-stakes matches can hardly deliver a solid performance. Alonso sidelined Robert Sánchez, yet the newcomer's quality is simply not up to the task. Palmer's red card was understandable; both he and Rogers were playing in highly awkward positions, and their emotional frustration naturally led to red-card offenses.

The midfield players press high up the pitch to create chances and deliver the ball to the frontline for attacks, yet the frontline players press without a proper center-forward in place, leaving the team with no focal point to find in the box after breaking through. Alonso already holds a great hand of cards in the midfield and frontline; the defensive midfield pairing of Jordan Henderson and Caicedo worked surprisingly well, with Caicedo's return noticeably increasing defensive solidity. Unfortunately, the starting goalkeeper and striker were injured again, and Alonso is no tactical mastermind—his limited ability leaves him incapable of adjusting tactics to patch up these fatal flaws. Looking back at the Blues' history, managers who won major titles—including Mourinho, Ancelotti, Conte, and Tuchel—were all world-class elite managers. Chelsea has withered away for years under the chaotic governance of its American owners. Although things are being steered back on track now, historical precedent suggests that bringing back an experienced veteran manager guarantees results. As for those young, overhyped "media-darling" managers, it is best to stop at a shallow taste. Isn't Conte currently unemployed at home? It wouldn't hurt to get in touch with him!

小坂ひまり - Sunny Wedding

車路士主場完敗熱刺流量名帥阿朗素應該儘快讓賢

車路士在主場恥辱性地輸給狀態低迷的熱刺，賽前祖奧帕度受傷，阿朗素排出了一個奇怪的無鋒陣，羅傑士中鋒，從未上場打右路的昆達首發打左路，哈圖打右路。大雨下場地濕滑，流暢的地面攻擊打不出來，況且前場攻擊非常依賴鋒綫球員的個人發揮，現在的藍軍除了讓出球權打反擊外，沒有任何賽前的戰術配合佈置，完全就是球員的靈光一現而已，在正常賽事下，個人能力能夠發揮下自然沒有問題，但遇到突發情況以阿朗素的能力，戰敗已成必然。

昆達有勇無謀反復上搶頻繁失球權，哈圖攻强守弱他上場協防必然漏洞百出。不上維畢克正中鋒，羅扎士不習慣頂在前面，帕度在左路不得不攻防兼顧，阿昌彭面對熱刺的反復衝擊顧此失彼，全場熱刺頻繁攻擊藍軍薄弱的防守右路，最終導致了守門員門德斯右路角球脫手將球打入自家球門。高爾彭馬反擊不成下與對方發生衝突紅牌罰下，藍軍隨之再失第二球完敗。整體上熱刺攻擊思路清晰，球員態度積極執行教練意圖明確，場面上車路士戰術和陣型極其混亂，場面被動至極，根本不能形成有效射門。

阿朗素堅持所謂3-4-3打法但所用非人，而且不能針對不同對手使用不同打法，車仔現有的配置更適合打傳統的4-2-3-1，甘地曾用相同3-4-3陣型贏得英超冠軍，但他當時有馬非斯阿朗素和摩西斯，而且藍軍多年來後衛帶刀防守見長，在歐洲是頂級的防守能力强橫球隊。反觀阿朗素如同曼聯的阿莫林死守陣型變化欠奉，不能根據實際情況做出調整，換人遲緩沒有目的性。開賽至今整個球隊完全依賴個人能力，全球沒有任何戰術可言。他在德甲只要發揮穩定，搞定拜仁就能奪冠，況且德甲是整個聯賽養一支球隊，爲了多少提供一點懸念，拜仁每隔數年會突然讓出冠軍，這也是賠率方面的需要。在英超混不下去的基爾賓尼都可以在拜仁打出名堂成爲名帥。阿朗素在德甲的成功并不説明他有能力，在皇馬的失敗正是的無能的體現。

在他治下進攻完全靠臨時機會的把握，談不上任何戰術佈置。應對場上的突發情況手足無措，換人調度完全沒有針對性。好球員未必是好教練，沒有經過十幾年頂級聯賽的磨練，取得過人成績證明自己，依靠個人名氣帶隊雖偶有佳績，但最終難逃失敗命運。門德斯上場比賽替補就看出其技術弱點，空有身高卻不敢空中接球，喜歡胡亂出擊不注重站位，守門員沒有經過大賽歷練，很難有好表現。阿朗素下放桑切斯，但新人水平難堪大任。彭馬的紅牌情有可原，他和羅渣士都踢得彆扭，情緒失控下都有紅牌動作。

中場球員前場逼搶創造機會交給前場球員進攻，現在前場球員逼搶但卻沒有中鋒，導致突破后找不到進攻點。阿朗素中前場已有好牌，佐敦軒達臣和卡斯度作爲防守雙中場效果意外地好，卡斯度回歸后防守力度增加。可惜主力門將和前鋒又傷，阿朗素并非戰術大師能力有限，不能做出戰術調整彌漏洞缺陷。從藍軍的歷史來講，奪冠包括莫連奴，安察洛迪，甘地，杜曹等都是世界名帥。車路士在美國老闆的混亂統治下荒廢了多年，現在雖然撥亂反正但參考以往，還是請回老帥成績有保證。至於那些年輕流量名帥，還是淺嘗即止爲好，甘地不是待業在家，不妨聯係一下！