Translate

2026年2月20日 星期五

No War with Iran: Trump Turns to Stock Market Investments

 


Trump pressured the Iranian government to begin negotiations within 15 days, otherwise military action would be taken. At the same time, two U.S. aircraft carrier fleets arrived at designated positions, exerting military pressure on Iran. This kind of “maximum pressure” tactic has already been used countless times. To believe he would actually launch a war against Iran is naïve—this is merely his bargaining excuse. After a few days, he will deny everything he said and repeat the same trick again. To truly start a war requires strategic deception, as the art of war says: “When far, show as near; when near, show as far; when capable, show as incapable.” Before fighting, there must be prolonged negotiations to lull the opponent while preparing comprehensively, then strike suddenly when the enemy is unprepared.


In today’s information age, where military actions are highly transparent, launching a war against a strong Middle Eastern opponent with nearly a million regular and irregular troops by simply announcing it verbally is laughable. Iran, as the long-time center of anti-American and anti-Israeli resistance, has fought a decade-long religious war with Iraq. With a land area of over a million square kilometers and a population exceeding 100 million, although its air force is weak, its army has some strength and is capable of guerrilla warfare and total war. The country possesses a complete military industry, able to produce everything from bayonets to ballistic missiles. Even under recent overwhelming Israeli airstrikes targeting nuclear facilities, Iran can retaliate with issiles and drones, to the point of nearly exhausting Israel’s air defense ammunition.


Although the U.S. has long stationed troops in the Middle East, even with Israeli forces, any military action against Iran would require ground warfare. In such a case, even a U.S.-Israeli coalition would lack sufficient manpower and is not prepared for a prolonged war. Iranian uprisings are sudden events, and future developments are unpredictable. Trump’s so-called maximum pressure is nothing more than a political show, intended to attract attention and boost his political standing. He is merely a clumsy businessman, not a statesman. His main purpose in governing is to consolidate internal control and secure family interests. Large-scale military action, let alone war, is not his option, and he has consistently avoided it during his administration.


As for the capture of Venezuela’s Maduro, it was merely a political show completed under full infiltration and coordination with Russia’s Putin. In form, key military targets were bombed, and with no resistance, less than a platoon of special forces carried out the operation—one U.S. soldier wounded, about 30 Cuban casualties. After the political deal was struck, the arrest was just a procedural step. Russian military advisers were the real directors of the operation, so Maduro was nothing more than a bargaining chip.


To eliminate Iran’s theocratic government cannot be achieved by airstrikes alone. Moreover, Iran has already prepared for Trump’s repeated pressure, currently stabilizing domestic conditions and suppressing uprisings. The U.S., apart from verbal support for Iranian protesters, has provided no substantive military aid, and has even restricted Israel. Trump’s current military pressure is just another online war of words, given his long-standing lack of credibility. The movement of one or two carrier fleets proves nothing—after all, four carrier fleets cruising in the Asia-Pacific is common. Therefore, a war against Iran is unlikely in the short term. This is simply Trump, after a few weeks of quiet, making money again in the stock market.


Iran’s oil will only come into play after the U.S. digests Venezuela’s reserves. As for Trump’s constant outrageous remarks, the whole world knows they are nothing more than tricks to attract attention like an internet celebrity.

 

特朗普現在不會打伊朗而且在股市建倉需要買入

 


特朗普施壓伊朗政府必須在15天內展開談判,否則採取軍事行動,與此同時美國2個航母艦隊也到達指定位置,對伊朗施加軍事威脅。特朗普的這種極限施壓,已經使用了不知道多少次,要是相信他會對伊朗發動戰爭就太幼稚了,這是他討價還價的慣用藉口而已。過不了幾天他就會轉口否認所説的一切,然後再一次故技重演。真要發動戰爭必須進行戰略欺騙,也就是兵法所説“遠而示之近,近而示之遠,能而示之不能”。開打前必然會與對方展開漫長和談爭取條件,麻痹對方的同時進行全方位的準備工作,然後趁敵不備突然發動軍事行動。


在資訊化社會,軍事行動高度透明的當下,面對中東強大的對手,正規和不對稱部隊將近百萬,以口頭通知發動戰爭的行徑極其可笑。伊朗作爲長期領導反美反以色列的中心國家,進行過長達十年與伊拉克的宗教戰爭,百萬平方公里土地人口過億,雖然空中力量薄弱但陸軍有一定實力,並且具備打地面遊擊戰和全民戰爭的能力,該國本身擁有完整的軍事工業,從步槍刺刀到彈道導彈都能生產。即便遇到近期以色列針對核武的壓倒性空中打擊,伊朗仍然能夠用導彈和無人機反擊,甚至搞到以色列防空彈藥幾乎用盡的地步。


美國雖然常年在中東駐軍,加上以色列的部隊,能夠展開對伊朗的軍事行動,但真要徹底清剿必定要進行地面戰,如此即便美以聯軍出動兵力仍顯不足,甚至根本就沒有做好長期化戰爭的準備。伊朗民衆起義屬於突發事件,未來發展難以預期。特朗普所謂的極限施壓完全就是一場政治秀,用以吸引外界的注意力提高自己的政治聲望。他只是一個蹩腳商人並非政治家,執政的主要目的是鞏固內部統治和賺取家族利益,對外採取大規模軍事行動,甚至發動戰爭並非他的選項,而且他執政以來一直都是盡量避免的。


對於委內瑞拉馬杜洛的抓捕是全面滲透下與俄國普京勾兌完成後,最後採取的政治秀而已,沒有實質上的軍事意義,形式上轟炸重點軍事目標後,在沒有遇到抵抗下,不到一個排的特種部隊展開行動,己方一人受傷,對方傷亡了30多個古巴人而已。政治交易完成後落實到抓人只是履行手續。俄羅斯軍事顧問則是行動指導者,所以馬杜洛無非就是交換的籌碼而已。


對伊朗神權政府的清剿只靠空襲不能徹底解決問題,況且特朗普多次施壓伊朗,對方已有準備,目前正在全面穩定國內局勢剿滅起義。美國除了口頭支援伊朗民衆外,沒有在軍事上提供任何實質性的援助。對於以色列也加以限制。特朗普現在所謂的軍事施壓,無非就是他歷來毫無信用可言下,發動的又一場網絡口水戰爭。一兩個航母艦隊的調動能夠説明什麽,在亞太4個航母艦隊的巡航也很常見。因此,對於伊朗的戰爭短期內不可能發生,這是特朗普在消停了幾個星期,又在股票市場做倉賺錢了。


伊朗的石油還是要等美國把委內瑞拉的庫存消化完了再説,至於特朗普不斷製造的各種出位言論,全世界都知道這不過是網紅吸引注意的伎倆而已。

池永百合

 









小嶋陽菜

 









小日向結衣

 









桜羽のどか 僕だけのG乳メイド

 









晨曦杜鵑 (8)

 





岡田紗佳

 









2026年2月16日 星期一

The Russia–Ukraine War Continues Thanks to Two Things: Trump’s Scowl and China’s Cash

 


The Russia–Ukraine war has lasted for a full four years and is still stuck in a stalemate. After Donald Trump came to power, he hoped to force Ukraine to cede territory and pay compensation through strong pressure. In the end, due to strong backlash from Europe, he did not succeed, and internationally it also triggered negative consequences. Ultimately, the U.S. had to withdraw, which indirectly helped Russia and led to the collapse of NATO. His pre-election promise to end the war within 24 hours was nothing but a joke, just like many of his other empty political promises. Putin cannot accept a ceasefire under any conditions, because that would mean losing his legitimacy to rule. In Russian history, after paying a huge price without gaining land or benefits, such an outcome is unacceptable for a strong leader, as it would show national weakness. As long as the war continues, Putin can maintain domestic control; otherwise, once millions of troops return home after a ceasefire, it would mean the end of his political life. Russia has experienced this more than once in history.

For Ukraine, sustaining the war is not difficult, since Europe has basically passed legislation openly supporting Ukraine’s fight against Russia. As long as European funding arrives, Ukraine can keep fighting. For Russia, the continuation of the war also comes down to money. With Russia’s energy exports having dropped sharply, the war now depends more on China’s support. If China continues to buy Russian energy, the war can go on; otherwise, only a ceasefire remains. At present, neither side has the strength to unilaterally change the course of the war. Russia relies on human-wave tactics to maintain offensives, but these small-scale attacks are militarily meaningless. Ukraine has shifted to a defensive posture, concentrating strikes on Russia’s energy facilities, manufacturing, communications, and military industries, gradually weakening Russia’s war potential and extending the impact into civilian life.

This all-around attrition has moved beyond the battlefield to affect the daily lives of ordinary Russians. Objectively speaking, maintaining the stalemate benefits both sides, and the costs are relatively manageable. Compared with the large-scale clashes in the early stages of the war, Russia now launches company-level assaults in occupied areas every day, entangling with Ukrainian forces just to sustain the situation. Although Russia pays the price of thousands of casualties daily, it considers this negligible, as long as it can mobilize enough manpower and equipment to keep going. Ukraine has grown accustomed to Russia’s attacks; as long as it can hold the front lines and launch limited counteroffensives in summer, it can manage.

Both Putin and Zelensky insist on continuing the fight. Trump’s ability to interfere is limited—his chaos is global, and Russia is only one part of it. In fact, Putin has always been the one controlling Trump, leaving Trump helpless. Going forward, Europe will be the main driver of the war, while the U.S. has lost its global hegemon status and become a secondary power. Raising tariffs to suppress other countries will not succeed. Trump is merely an anomaly, a transitional political clown whose actions will eventually be erased and judged. For now, it is only a matter of how long the world can tolerate what remains of his political life.

俄烏戰爭維持下去靠兩樣東西:特朗普的臭臉和中國的現錢

 


俄烏克戰爭進行了整整4年,目前還是維持在僵持狀態,特朗普上臺后希望通過强力施壓逼迫烏克蘭割地賠款,最後在歐洲的强力反彈下沒有得逞,而且在國際上也引發負面影響,最後也只好以美國退出的方式幫助俄羅斯,變相導致了北約的崩潰。他上臺前所謂24小時結束戰爭的承諾無非就是個笑話,正如他做出的各種無聊政治承諾一樣。普京不可能接受任何條件下的停戰,如此他就會失去執政的合法性,在俄國歷史上付出重大代價后既沒有得到土地,也沒有獲得各方面的利益,這對一個强勢領袖來説是不被允許的,因爲這樣等於顯示了國家的軟弱。只要戰爭能夠繼續下去普京就能維持國内的統治,否則停戰后退下來的百萬軍隊,對於他個人來講也意味著政治生命的結束。俄國在歷史上發生過不止一次。


對於烏克蘭來講維繫戰爭并不困難,而且歐洲基本上以立法的形式公開支持烏克蘭對俄作戰,只要歐洲的資金到位烏克蘭就能繼續打下去。對於俄國戰爭持續所需要面對的也是一個錢字。由於俄羅斯的能源出口近來大幅減少,因此戰爭的進程更加依賴中國的援助,如果中繼續購買俄羅斯的能源,戰爭就能維持否則只有停戰。於此同時中國也是烏克蘭最大的貿易夥伴,每年貿易額在200億美元以上。現在俄烏雙方都沒有單方面改變戰爭進程的實力,俄羅斯通過人海戰術雖然仍能保持攻勢,但這種中小規模的進攻是形勢上,在軍事上毫無價值可言。烏克蘭主動采取守勢,將打擊力量集中到攻擊戰場以外的俄羅斯能源設施,加工製造,交通通信,軍工生產等產業上,不斷削弱俄羅斯的軍工實力和戰爭潛能,并且逐步延展到民生方面。


這種全方位的消耗已經從戰場上軍備和人員,轉移到俄羅斯人日常生活的各個層面。客觀上說保持僵持的局面對雙方都有利,相對來講代價也不算大。相對于戰爭前期的大規模軍事衝突,現在俄羅斯每天在占領地區發動連排級的攻勢,與烏軍糾纏在一起就能維持局面,雖然每天付出千人的代價,但對於俄國來講這可以忽略不計,只要還能動員足夠人員凑足裝備,就能維持相當長的一段時間。烏克蘭對於俄軍的攻勢也習以爲常,只要能夠保持住戰綫,并且在夏季發動部份地區反攻即可。通過戰爭烏克蘭獲益甚多,不但成爲世界上維護和平的主導力量,發展出了歐洲最强大的軍隊,得到了國際上全方位的關注和支持,已經成爲舉足輕重的國家。


對於普京和澤連斯基來講都堅持要打下去,特朗普的攪局能力有限,他製造的混亂是世界性的,俄羅斯只是其中一個方面,況且普京始終是主導特朗普的力量,特朗普無可奈何。今後俄烏戰爭的主導力量將是歐洲,美國已失去全球霸主地位,成爲次一級的國家。通過加關稅來打壓其他國家不可能成功。特朗普只是一個異類,過渡性的政治小丑,他的所作所爲最後都會被消除和清算。現在無非是看世界人民對他剩下的政治生命如何忍耐了。

本庄鈴 『 Feeling 』