白川のぞみ「たわわたわわ」

 

Exciting Girls 高梨瑞街

 

Horse year and bad luck for Maduro Captured at New Year

 

Maduro, the President of Venezuela, was captured alive by U.S. military action. According to Trump’s version of events, it was Russian military advisers who betrayed him, revealing all of Maduro’s secrets to the Americans, which ultimately led to U.S. forces seizing the Venezuelan president without a fight. In the “Year of the Horse,” those connected to “horse” are said to be unlucky—Maduro’s surname sounds like “horse” in Chinese, so he was the first to be struck at the start of the new year.

Believing the story of a Russian colonel betraying the president is too naïve. The real mastermind must be Putin, who sold out Maduro and his wife as a bargaining chip to escape the quagmire of the Russia–Ukraine war. He is Trump’s true boss. For this, the U.S. was willing to withdraw from NATO, betray its European allies, lose international credibility, and even help Putin by pressuring Ukraine to cede territory and pay reparations. Rumors of a Russia–Ukraine ceasefire are likely not baseless—there may already be a secret agreement. Venezuela, as a pawn, was abandoned to give Trump a boost in his poor record, helping him regain ground for the upcoming midterm elections.

After losing badly in the U.S.–China trade war, Trump has been moving aggressively: launching strikes in Thailand against Chinese-backed Cambodian cyber fraud parks, carrying out a decapitation operation in Venezuela—all aimed at China. China has massive investments in Venezuela, including energy interests and military aid, and Maduro himself is deeply tied to Beijing. His political faction is heavily influenced by China. The collapse of the Venezuelan government would be a major blow to China—not only economically, in energy and military terms, but also by uprooting one of the most important Belt and Road footholds in the Americas.

As a businessman-president, Trump does not want to follow previous administrations in propping up a pro-U.S. government there. Instead, under political and military cover, he intends for American energy companies and traders to control Venezuela’s economy through cooperation, and then expand influence across all sectors. For this reason, the country’s opposition leader—who just won a Nobel Prize—has not received U.S. support. The deeper meaning is that Trump must consider Russia’s interests in the region, so he has no intention of completely purging the old government for now. At the same time, he is watching China’s reaction. Maduro and his wife, along with China’s interests in Venezuela, have become Trump’s key bargaining chips.

Trump’s urgency in resolving the Russia–Ukraine war is not only to please Putin, but also because he needs to gather strength to confront China. After years of trade war, he realized he cannot defeat China economically. The initiator of the so-called Indo-Pacific strategy, Shinzo Abe, has already been assassinated, and even Trump himself nearly got shot during his campaign. India, having lost an air battle to Pakistan backed by China, is of little use. Thus, Trump urgently needs new breakthroughs to rebuild the strategic zone: Japan protecting Taiwan, increased arms sales to Taiwan, Thailand striking Cambodia, the decapitation of Venezuela’s leadership, and even Iran’s internal unrest—largely caused by years of U.S. sanctions—all are part of America’s intensified pressure campaign against China. Just three hours after China’s envoy visited Venezuela and made promises, the U.S. launched military action. Economically, America cannot match China’s global expansion, but strategically, it does not even regard China as a serious rival.

China’s international partners are dwindling, essentially facing political, diplomatic, and military encirclement. In East Asia, Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan are moving; to the north, Russia; to the southwest, India; to the south, Southeast Asian nations—all are taking action. In the Americas, Venezuela is unstable; in the Middle East, Iran is in turmoil. The pressure on China has shifted from the economic level of the trade war to the strategic level. The anti-U.S. policy pursued by China’s top leadership for over a decade, if not adjusted in time, will inevitably lead to military confrontation. If China loses allies internationally—even Russia siding with the U.S.—then under extreme encirclement, even winning the trade war would leave China isolated by the global community. Ultimately, this would trigger internal economic collapse. Right now is the most critical test for China’s reformist faction.

馬年不利馬命人，老杜洛新年就被捕

 

委內瑞拉馬杜洛總統被美國軍事行動生擒，按照特朗普的説法出賣他的是俄羅斯軍事顧問，他向美國透露了馬杜洛的所有機密，最後導致美軍兵不血刃再次成功抓捕他囯總統。“馬年”與馬有關的人流年不利，馬杜洛的姓在中文裏和“馬”諧音，所以新年伊始就首當其衝。

如果相信所謂俄國上校出賣總統的説法太幼稚了，幕後黑手必然是普京，他出賣馬杜洛夫婦，以此作爲他在俄烏戰爭中脫困的籌碼，他才是特朗普的真正老闆，爲此美國不惜退出北約，背叛歐洲盟友喪失國際信用，並且助紂爲虐威脅烏克蘭割地賠款。現在俄烏停戰的傳聞估計不是空穴來風，很有可能背後秘密協議已經達成，委內瑞拉作爲棋子被拋棄，給特朗普的糟糕政績加分，爭取在將來的中期選舉中挽回頹勢。特朗普在中美貿易戰徹底失利後動作頻頻，發動泰國打擊中國支持的柬埔寨電詐園區，對委內瑞拉展開斬首行動，目的都是指向中國。中國在委內瑞拉有龐大投資，能源利益和軍事援助，並且和馬杜洛本人勾兌很深，他的政治利益集團也受中國控制，委內瑞拉政府倒臺後對中國的打擊很大，不單是在經濟，能源，軍事方面，而且“一帶一路”在美洲最重要的據點被拔出。

特朗普作爲商人總統不想仿效歷屆政府在當地扶持親美政府的先例，而是政治軍事背書下由美國能源公司和貿易商，通過合作的形式控制委內瑞拉經濟，並在此基礎上進行全方位滲透和合作。因此該國剛獲得諾貝爾獎的反對派領袖並未獲得美國支援，其中深意是特朗普需要顧及俄羅斯在當地的利益，所以目前並未有徹底清除舊政府進行清算的意願，而且與此同時也會觀察中國對此的反應。馬杜洛夫婦和中國在當地的利益，已經成爲特朗普的重要籌碼。

特朗普急於解決俄烏戰爭的目的不僅是爲了討好普京，更加急迫的是他需要積蓄力量對付中國，他在多年的貿易戰後發現在經濟上對抗中國力不從心。當年所謂印太戰略區的發起人安倍晉三都已經被暗殺，他在競選中也差點中槍。印度在空戰中完敗給中國支持的巴基斯坦不堪大用，因此他急需找到新突破點重塑戰略區，因此有了日本保護台灣，對台灣加強軍售，泰國打擊柬埔寨，委內瑞拉夫婦被斬首，甚至伊朗內部動亂的主因也是美國的多年制裁，對中國圍堵打壓的力度不可謂小。中國特使訪問委內瑞拉做出承諾後的3小時就採取軍事行動，美國在全球經濟擴張上難敵中國，但在國際戰略上根本沒有將中國放在眼裏。

中國的國際戰略夥伴越辣越少，其實質就是政治外交軍事層面被戰略圍堵，亞太東部的日韓台，中國北部的俄羅斯，西南面的印度，南部的東南亞國家，都開始陸續開始有所動作。遠在美洲的委內瑞拉，中東的伊朗都變動不斷。對於中國的打壓已經從貿易戰的經濟層面轉向，最高領導十幾年執行的反美政策，如果不及時轉變必定會引發軍事對抗。如果中國在國際上盟友盡失，甚至俄羅斯都投向美國，在極限圍堵下即便打贏了貿易戰，也會被國際社會切割孤立，最後造成內部經濟失控下被打垮。因此目前是對中國內部改開派，進行最後考驗的最關鍵時刻了。

Chelsea’s Year of the Horse: Maresca Resigns — In Football, Money Matters More Than Brains

 

Maresca resigned on New Year’s Day, right after the previous article was published—truly a case of speaking too soon in the Year of the Horse. Later, some inside stories emerged: interference from the club’s top management, restrictions from the medical team, and invitations from other clubs. Contacting other clubs was a contractual requirement; the idea of him coaching Manchester City was nonsense. As long as City’s head coach stays, Maresca has no chance, and even if the position opens, he would not be the first choice. The main issue is his ability—his mentor-disciple relationship is not the deciding factor.

Chelsea’s tradition of sacking managers is well known. With fierce competition, several clubs have already changed coaches this season, and some saw immediate improvement. Meanwhile, Liverpool’s Slot and Manchester United’s Amorim have also faced heavy criticism, at times close to being dismissed, only recently easing the pressure. Maresca, however, resigned voluntarily. After switching to agent Mendes, he left immediately—clearly premeditated, and he had no worries about finding a new club. Conflicts with the board, especially over player selection and recruitment, did exist, but such disputes are common in big clubs. Ultimately, results decide a coach’s fate. In November, when results were good, he boasted about winning the title; last year, after winning two trophies, he pledged loyalty to the club. But in December, results collapsed. The main reason was his own level, and giving up under pressure is not the mark of a top coach.

Chelsea’s Europa Conference League win was essentially a step down in competition, and their Club World Cup success was largely due to favorable draws. The real credit goes to the players, especially Palmer’s brilliance. Maresca’s contribution was minimal, much of it down to luck. In the Premier League, title contenders must collect points mainly against mid- and lower-table teams; against strong opponents, avoiding defeat is enough—even dropping some points is acceptable. Thus, weaker teams should be attacked aggressively, while stronger teams can be approached conservatively. In reality, Maresca’s tactics were the opposite: going all out against strong teams, half-abandoning matches against weaker ones. This led to excessive fatigue in big games—even when winning, the squad suffered too much damage. After hitting peak form, players declined, and points were lost repeatedly. Beating Barcelona and drawing Arsenal with ten men were highlights, but they were followed by a sharp downturn. In December, the team dropped many points and failed to hold leads. Maresca’s in-game management was heavily criticized, with fans also turning against him. His tactical adjustments were riddled with errors, and his rigid rotation policy was widely condemned. It makes far more sense to start with the main squad to secure an advantage before rotating, rather than chasing from behind with late substitutions.

Against Arsenal, Caicedo’s red card suspension for three matches was a huge blow. Without him, Chelsea’s defense was full of holes, their attacking transitions broke down, and the team became completely disjointed. The same happened against Manchester City: passive deep defending was understandable, but counterattacks were nonexistent. Palmer struggled to organize, pressing failed entirely. While Palmer’s poor form was a factor, the bigger issue was Caicedo’s absence. Without his sweeping presence, City controlled the midfield completely, and Chelsea couldn’t hold the ball. Add to that Cucurella and Sánchez’s lack of effort, and the eventual equalizer was pure luck, even influenced by off-field factors.

In the Year of the Horse, those connected to “horse” are affected—Maresca’s departure was also a matter of fate. His successor is expected to be an obscure coach with French league connections, but clearly just a transitional figure. Unless he achieves results—qualifying for the Champions League and winning a cup—he will also leave at season’s end. The Premier League rule is simple: to succeed, you need a proven top manager. A “top manager” means someone who has either won the Champions League, won their domestic league, or has extensive experience with innovation. That’s all. Chelsea’s owner has money but no brains, and believes that in modern football, money matters more than intelligence.

車路士馬年馬教練離職足球錢比腦子更重要

 

馬列斯卡元旦離職，就在上一篇文章發出之後，真是馬年開口就中。事後爆出一些內幕，無非是收到球會高層幹預，醫療團隊掣肘，還有其他球會的邀請之類。聯絡其他球會是合約要求，所謂執教曼城是無稽之談，只要藍月亮主教練不走，馬列斯卡毫無機會，就算走也不會用首先考慮馬列斯卡，主要是他的能力問題，師徒關係不是主要因素。

車路士亂炒教練是傳統，由於競爭激烈本賽季已經有多支球隊更換教練，而且部份球隊成績迅速反彈。另一方面利物浦斯洛特和曼聯阿莫連也是飽受爭議，曾經一度在被炒的邊緣，近期才有所緩解。馬列斯卡是自己辭職要走的，他換了經紀人門迪斯立刻走人，這一切都是有預謀，他也根本不愁下家。與球會高層的衝突特別是在用人方面是有的，在球員引入方面也有對立，這其實在大球會中也是平常事，最終決定去留的還是成績。11月成績好時他揚言奪冠，去年連獲2冠時對球會表示忠心，12月份對賽成績一落千丈，最主要原因是他的水準問題，更何況受到壓力就放棄，也非頂級教練所爲。

歐協杯屬於藍軍降維打擊，世俱杯是抽籤有利，最主要還是球員，特別是帕爾馬的天才表演，馬列斯卡的功勞很少，相當部份屬於運氣。英超想爭冠拿分主要在中下游球隊身上，對陣強隊只要力爭不輸球即可，甚至失一些分也可以接受。所以對陣弱隊要全力出擊，對陣強隊則可以保守一些。事實上馬列斯卡的部署是對陣強隊拼盡全力，對陣弱隊半放棄的狀態，如此在與強隊的對抗中消耗過度，即便贏得比賽內部也損傷過大，球員狀態進入興奮點後下滑，最後失分連連。贏了巴塞羅那，打少一人平了阿仙奴，高光表現後是球隊成績的大幅下跌，在12月賽期失去大量積分，而且領先後也不能保持。馬列斯卡的臨場執教表現也是大受抨擊，甚至與球迷也是對立狀態，戰術調整錯漏百出。硬性的輪換制度更是爲人所詬病。寧可先出主力取得優勢再輪換，也比落後再上主力追分更符合邏輯。

力拼阿仙奴卡斯度紅牌停賽三場，對車路士打擊很大，沒有他不但防守漏洞百出，進攻銜接也斷裂，整體攻防脫節漏洞百出。對陣曼城也是如此，消極防守壓縮回防無可厚非，但反擊完全打不出來，彭馬難於組織，對搶全部失敗，其中有彭馬狀態差的因素，更主要是卡斯度停賽，沒有他的掃蕩中場被曼城全部控制，藍軍根本拿不住球。況且還有古古尼亞和桑切斯的倦勤，最後追平比分完全是偶然機會，甚至球場外的因素的影響。

馬年與馬相關的人受影響，馬列斯卡走人也是大運所致，現在接手的估計是名不見經傳的法甲關係戶教練，但可以肯定最多算一個過渡人物，除非剩餘賽季取得成績，晉級歐冠和杯賽捧杯，否則還是賽季完成後走人的下場。英超的規律是想要成績好，必須請證明過自己的名帥執教，名帥的定義是要麽拿過歐冠，要麽拿過本國聯賽冠軍，要麽執教經驗豐富並且有創新，如此而已！藍軍老闆錢是有的，腦子沒有，而且覺得當今足球，錢比腦子更重要！

新谷真由 「島の奇跡」

 

鈴村あいり【接吻-せっぷん-】

 

晨曦杜鵑 (5)

 

Trump Push America Into the ‘ Sinking Program’

 

After Trump’s second rise to power, he aided his patrons China and Russia in bringing about America’s complete decline. In less than a year of his destructive rule, the United States has already, without question, begun to collapse—at a speed and scale unmatched. Although Trump came to office under the slogan “Make America Great Again,” it resembles Putin’s “Give me 20 years and I’ll return you a strong Russia,” and China’s “Great Rejuvenation of the Chinese Nation—the China Dream.” These narratives follow the same logic: not shameless lies exactly, but promises whose hopes of success were already doomed at the moment they were made. America has never truly declined, Russia is not truly strong, and China may not necessarily be rejuvenated.

Cracking down on China’s authoritarian government with a trade war was understandable, but launching a trade war against the entire world only pushed countries to hedge their bets, using China as leverage to counter U.S. economic sanctions. In reality, this accelerated China’s expansion in international trade. U.S.–China economic cooperation has been a long‑term national policy pursued by successive American governments since the end of the Cold War. To change it requires a long‑term, targeted plan, coordinated with allies, gradually cutting ties until full decoupling is achieved—a process that would take at least a decade. Instead, Trump launched a global trade war, driving allies toward China and isolating the U.S. Given the deep entanglement of U.S.–China economic ties, short‑term separation is impossible, and the return of manufacturing lacks basic conditions. Thus, when China introduced its so‑called rare earth control strategy, the U.S. effectively admitted defeat and abandoned the trade war.

After forty years of globalization, the tariffs imposed during the trade war ultimately balanced out and canceled each other. Today, the trade war is no longer a topic Trump even mentions. Beyond creating countless confrontations internationally, he has abandoned the fight on trade tariffs, powerless to continue—a complete farce. China emerged with absolute victory, gaining deeper and broader economic influence worldwide, becoming the true leader of the global economy. The U.S., meanwhile, alienated allies, pursued only its own interests, harmed global economic development, and surrendered its role as international economic leader, becoming marginalized.

To help Putin out of his predicament, America under Trump even sided with Russia, indirectly withdrawing from NATO and halting military aid to Ukraine. With the U.S. abandoning Europe, Britain, France, and Germany led other nations in independently resisting Russia. As Ukraine’s military strength and striking power grew, Europe proved capable of handling its own affairs without U.S. intervention, provided support for Ukraine continued. With America’s exit from NATO, it lost leadership and ceased to be taken seriously in other international matters. In short, the U.S. has been marginalized. Losing military leadership inevitably undermined its economic position, and the continued decline of the dollar became inevitable. 

The military and monetary advantages America relied on since World War II have vanished. As Russia’s accomplice, the U.S. lost Europe’s trust. Other nations scoffed at America’s abandonment of allies, of European security, and of opposition to aggression. Thus, the U.S. forfeited its role as guardian of international peace, and the post‑WWII American‑led political, economic, military, and diplomatic system collapsed. In short, America lost its international credibility.

Rumors swirl that Trump’s wife is a Russian spy. After multiple bankruptcies, Trump was repeatedly rescued by Russian funds. As early as the 1980s, during a visit to the Soviet Union, he received certain promises. In his first presidential campaign, he gained Russian support, exploiting loopholes in the U.S. electoral system, turning himself into an internet celebrity to attract traffic, and ultimately winning the presidency. Upon his second election, his urgent mission was to help Russia turn its invasion of Ukraine into a fait accompli—cutting off military aid to force Zelensky’s surrender and the partition of Ukraine. Next, with U.S. approval and assistance, Russia would launch military action against the Baltic states and Poland, then Sweden, Finland, Turkey, and eventually all of Europe. Thus, Putin’s “Russian Dream” would be realized, with Trump as the Cold War‑era strategic pawn against NATO, finally dismantling NATO after the Soviet Union’s collapse.

In just one year, Trump helped China and Russia achieve anti‑American goals they had pursued for decades without success. America has since entered decline, transformed from the world’s sole superpower and international leader into a marginalized nation led by a clown. In Trump’s subsequent three years of leadership, aside from his family profiting through open market manipulation, America as a global leader—the so‑called beacon of democracy—has long since gone dark. The countdown to “America sinking” has begun.

特朗普幫助中俄一年就使國家進入“美國沉沒程序”

 

特朗普二次上臺後的任務只有一個，幫助主子中俄讓美國徹底衰敗，而且僅僅在他為禍世界不到一年的時間，美國已經毫無疑問地走向衰落，而且速度和力度都無與倫比，雖然特朗普是以“讓美國再次偉大的口號”上臺，這象極了普京的“給我20年，還你一個強大的俄羅斯”，還有所謂競爭對手的“中華民族的偉大復興-中國夢”。這些敘事都是一個邏輯，狂妄荒誕的無恥謊言談不上，但實際成功的希望在做出承諾時已經破滅。他未上台時美國從未衰落，俄羅斯也不強大，中國未必復興。

打壓中國集權政府發動貿易戰無可厚非，但同時對全球發動貿易戰反使各國多面下注，利用中國來作爲反制美國經濟變相制裁的籌碼，實際上反而加快了中國的國際貿易對外擴張。中美經濟合作是冷戰結束後的美國幾代政府採取的長期國策，如需改變必須制定長期有針對性的計劃，並且聯合盟友逐步切割打壓，最後才能達成全面脫鈎，整個過程最快也要十幾年。而不是對全球發動貿易戰，將盟友推向中國而孤立自己。中美經貿合作綁定極深，難於在中短期內切割，製造業回歸根本不具備基本條件。所以在中方祭出所謂稀土管控戰略後，美國實際上已認輸貿易戰偃旗息鼓。

在經歷40多年全球化的影響，貿易戰造成的所謂互相徵收關稅的實質，最後還是達成貿易平衡相互抵消而已。現在貿易戰已不再成爲特朗普掛在嘴邊的話題，除了在國際上d製造無數對抗和對立面後，在經貿層面的國際貿易稅率上，他已經因無能爲力而放棄，這完全就是一場鬧劇。中國通過對美貿易戰取得了絕對的勝利，在國際上獲得了更有深度更廣汎的經濟影響力，真正成爲領導全世界經濟的主導力量。美國則衆叛親離成立只顧自身經濟利益，損害世界經濟發展和經貿合作的罪魁禍首，拱手讓出國際經濟領導者的身份被邊緣化。

爲了幫助普京擺脫困境美國，居然在特朗普領導下站在俄羅斯一邊，爲此還間接退出了北約，停止了對烏克蘭的軍事援助。既然歐洲必須獨立面對歐洲大陸的安全問題，在美國放棄的情況下，英法德領導其他國家獨立對抗俄羅斯，在烏克蘭軍事實力和打擊能力不斷提高的現實下，只要維繫對烏克蘭的政經軍事援助，歐洲完全有能力不在美國的幹預直接處理歐洲事務，同樣美國出走北約失去領導權，自然也在其他國際事務在不會再受重視，簡而言之美國已經被邊緣化。喪失軍事領袖地位的同時，經濟地位也不可能不受影響，美元的持續衰落也是必然的。美國二戰後領導全球依賴的軍事和貨幣優勢都喪失了。作爲俄羅斯的幫凶，美國已經失去了歐洲的信任，世界其他國家對於美國放棄保護盟友，放棄歐洲安全，放棄反對侵略的立場嗤之以鼻，如此美國也就失去國際和平維護者的領導地位，二戰後建立起來的美國主導的政經軍事外交體系也就隨之喪失了，簡而言之美國沒有了國際信用。

特朗普妻子是俄國間諜的傳言甚囂塵上，他自己多次破產後都是靠來自俄國的資金轉危爲安，而且在80年代訪問蘇聯時就得到某種承諾，並且在第一次競選總統時，得到了俄國各方面的幫助，利用美國大選制度的巨大漏洞，通過將自己打造成網紅吸引流量，然後成功當選了總統。再次當選後的急迫任務就是幫助俄國將侵略烏克蘭打造成既成事實，停止軍事援助迫使澤連斯基投降瓜分烏克蘭，後續自然是俄國在美國首肯和幫助下，對波羅的海三小國和波蘭發動軍事行動，然後是瑞典，芬蘭，土耳其乃至整個歐洲。如此普京的“俄羅斯夢”得以實現，特朗普作爲當年冷戰時代對付北約的戰略棋子，終於在蘇聯解體後，憑藉一己之力搞垮了北約。

特朗普一年就幫助中俄達成了反美多年都不能達成的夢想，美國從此走向衰敗，從世界唯一的強權國家國際領導者，成爲小丑領導的邊緣國家。在特朗普後續三年的領導下，除了他的家族可以通過公開操控市場大賺其錢外，美國作爲世界領導者，所謂民主燈塔更是早已熄滅，“美國沉沒”進入倒計時。

“Chelsea enter garbage time before New Year — Why haven’t they changed coach Yet?

 

Chelsea coach Maresca also dropped a large number of points during last year’s Christmas fixtures, and this year the situation has not changed at all. In fact, Chelsea are the team that has lost the most points from winning positions in the Premier League this season. In the early morning match against Bournemouth, they fell behind, then squandered the lead again, eventually scraping a 2–2 draw. The half‑rotated lineup in the first half left the defense in chaos; if not for Sánchez repeatedly saving dangerous shots, they would have already lost. Rigid squad rotation, with changes every match, has not guaranteed good form or reduced injuries. In reality, the weakened lineups and absence of key players often leave the team trailing and out of control, forcing the coach to bring on the main players to fight back, which ends up being counterproductive.

In the Premier League, points are earned by beating weaker sides, while against stronger teams the basic principle is simply not to lose. Maresca seems not to understand this, showing his limited level. Against strong opponents, his approach is nothing more than man‑marking, relying on physical effort and fighting spirit, with no tactical innovation. Chelsea’s goals now come only from occasional chances and flashes of individual brilliance, with no tactical execution. The match against Aston Villa was the same: Villa brought on three attacking players in the second half to stretch the wings, Rodgers dropped deeper to organize, and the central striker attacked through the middle. Immediately they created numerical superiority and quickly overturned the score. In this match, Chelsea’s full‑backs and center‑backs were all second‑choice, riddled with holes, leaving the central defense loose. Colwill was never reliable, so conceding goals was inevitable.

When Maresca substituted Cole Palmer, who had scored, the stadium erupted in boos. Some fans shouted: “You don’t even know what you’re doing.” This sums up the team’s problem. The squad is already formed and only needs reinforcement in a few positions to have title‑contending strength. Yet in the whole of December they won only once, and this season Chelsea have already dropped 15 points from winning positions. They cannot be called a strong team, and before the New Year they have already entered Premier League “garbage time.”

In the end, they will have to rely on a few cup competitions to save face, but given the current state, the chances look slim. The club once sacked the accomplished coach Tuchel, then replaced him with Potter, Lampard, Pochettino, and now Maresca—none of whom had experience leading a big club to success. Each appointment has wasted Chelsea’s time, while the club and fans cannot simply lower their expectations. This season, several mid‑table clubs have changed coaches and seen clear improvement. By Chelsea’s tradition, what are they still waiting for?

車路士沒過新年已進入垃圾時間還不換教練等什麽

 

車路士教練馬列斯卡在去年的聖誕賽期也是大量失分，今年情況完全沒有改變，而且是本季英超領先下失分最多的球隊，淩晨對般尼茅夫又是先落後後失分，最後2比2勉強打平對手。上半場的半替補陣容導致門前風聲鶴唳，不是桑切斯屢救險球早就輸球了。硬性輪換球員，每場陣容都有變化，並不能保證球隊有好狀態，球員能少受傷，每次實情是替補陣容和關鍵球員缺失，導致球隊落後場面失控，最後還是得把主力球員換上來拼消耗，最後結果是適得其反。

英超爭取分數靠從弱隊上取分，對付強隊只要不輸球即可，這種基本原則都搞不懂，馬列斯卡的水準實在有限。況且對陣強隊也不過是人盯人的踢法而已，這種戰術靠的是體能優勢和拼勁，談不上戰術上有何創新。車路士現在比賽得分靠的都是偶然性的機會，然後憑藉球員的靈光一現進球，沒有任何戰術上的發揮。對陣維拉亦是如此，對方下半場上3個前場球員拉開邊路，羅渣士退一個位置組織，中路正中鋒衝擊一下，馬上形成以多打少很快反超。本場邊路中路後衛都是副選，漏洞百出下中路防守鬆動，科芬拿本就不堪大用，失球也就在所難免。

馬列斯卡換走取得入球的高爾彭馬後，惹來現場噓聲四起。有球迷大叫：「你根本不知道自己在做甚麼」。這正是球隊問題之所在，藍軍隊伍已經成型，只要個別位置補強有爭冠的實力，然而整個12月僅勝1場，連本次車仔本季在領先情況下已失掉15分，實在談不上是強隊，新年前已經進入英超垃圾時間。

最後還是要靠幾個杯賽爭取門面面子，但按照目前的狀態看機會渺茫。球隊當年炒掉了功勛教練杜曹，換了撲達，林帕德，普捷天奴，再到馬列斯卡，多位水準能力一般的教練，全部沒有帶過大球會取得成績的經歷，勉強受命浪費了藍軍的時間，但球會和球迷又不可能沒有要求。本賽季中游球隊換了多位教練，成績都有明顯提升，按照傳統車路士還在等什麽？

彩川ひなの